Cases
The following are some of the cases handled by the firm. If you believe
that you are affected by any of the practices described in the cases
below or have similar issues please contact the firm:
Rudolph v. Florida
Department of Corrections, case number 67-02-CA-178, Washington County, Florida,
Circuit Court.
Kathy Rudolph and 28 other
non-security employees of the Florida Department Corrections brought
this class action lawsuit as a class action to correct sexual harassments
they have been subjected to by the Department’s failure to stop
and minimize sexual harassment of them and the class. Ms. Rudolph and
others were repeatedly subjected to harassment by inmates, in particular,
the practice of “gunning” or masturbating at them, and with
full knowledge the Department did nothing to protect them or train them
in how to deal with the harassment. The trial court certified the case
as a class action on December 30, 2003. The Court of Appeals affirmed
that ruling in September 2004. The case is presently set for trial starting
August 1, 2005. To view the trial court’s order certifying the
class click order.
Brillinger v. City of Lake Worth, case number 02-008931 AE, Palm Beach County,
Florida, Circuit Court.
Ralph Brillinger, a sergeant
with the Lake Worth Police Department, brought this case together with
another employee and civilian, against the City based on its blanket
policy of recording all incoming and outgoing telephone calls at its
Communications Center. The Florida Security of Communications Act makes
it illegal for law enforcement agencies to record telephone calls except
to 911 lines and published non-emergency numbers. The trial court certified
the case as a class action on September 11, 2003. The case was subsequently
decertified and is pending recertification. To view the trial court’s
order initially certifying the class click order.
Cooke v. Merck & Co.,
case number 5:05-CV-056, United States District Court, Northern District
of Florida.
Mary Cooke has brought this
case along with five other individuals who were prescribed and purchased
Vioxx. The case seeks to recover from the manufacturer of Vioxx damages
including a refund of the purchase price paid for Vioxx based on the
manufacturer’s failure to warn consumers of the known health dangers
posed by the drug. The case is in its early stages. To view the complaint
filed by Ms. Cooke click complaint.
Chapman and Macon
v. Butler & Hosch P.A., C. Victory Butler, Jr.,
and Robert H. Hosch, Jr., case number 2000-2879, Leon County, Florida,
Circuit Court.
Mr. Chapman and Ms. Macon
brought this class action suit against the attorney’s Bulter and
Hosch and their law firm based on their demanding and collecting illegal
attorney’s fees and costs in mortgage foreclosure actions against
consumers. The case is brought under Florida Consumer Collection Practices
Act, which prohibits illegal debt collection practices. The court certified
the case as a class action on May 18, 2005. To view the class certification
order click order.
|